Saturday, March 23, 2013

Research Paper - a Caution

Be very, very, very, very, very careful about plagiarism and be very, very, very, very careful about someone who helps you or gives you an old research paper to copy:

Jane Goodall Apologizes For Borrowed Passages

Monkey see, monkey do. The Washington Post has found at least a dozen borrowed passages in a forthcoming book by Jane Goodall, the eminent primatologist and expert on chimpanzees. A botany expert invited by the Post to review Seeds of Hope: Wisdom and Wonder From the World of Plants, noticed that as much as entire paragraphs were lifted from websites such as Wikipedia, and notified editors. The book, due out next month, is not about chimps but about plants, which is outside Goodall's expertise. She co-wrote the book with Gail Hudson, a freelance writer who's formerly the spiritual editor for Amazon.com. Hudson had no comment, but Goodall apologized and said that she was "distressed" to discover the lack of proper citations. "I hope it is obvious that my only objective was to learn as much as I could," she said. The publisher, Grand Central, said that a detailed plan has not been formulated yet "beyond crediting the sources in subsequent releases." Goodall said she would discuss the issue further on her blog.
March 21, 2013 1:12 PM

Friday, March 22, 2013

From THE WASHINGTON POST - Cliches'

Washington Post’s Outlook section avoids these words and phrases

Washington Post Outlook section editor Carlos Lozada writes: “After I saw the ‘iconic’ post, I thought you’d enjoy this running list that we keep in Outlook of words and phrases we should avoid. (I just added ‘iconic’ to the list.)”
THINGS WE DO NOT SAY IN OUTLOOK
At first glance
As a society (or, “as a nation”)
Observers
TK is not alone
Pundits say (or “Critics say”)
The American people (unless in a quote)
The narrative (unless referring to a style of writing)
Probe (as substitute for “investigation”)
A rare window (unless we’re talking about a real window that is in fact rare)
Begs the question (unless used properly – and so rarely used properly that not worth it)
Be that as it mayUnknown
It is important to note that
Needless to say
[Anything] 2.0 (or 3.0, or 4.0…)
At a crossroads
Outside the box/Out of the box
TK is a favorite Washington parlor game
Yes, Virginia, there is a TK
Underscored
Midwife (as a verb that does not involve childbirth)
Call it TK
Pity the poor TK
Imagine (as the first word in your lede)
Palpable sense of relief
Rorschach test (unless it is a real one)
The Other
Effort (as a verb)
Gestalt/Zeitgeist
Little-noticed (that just means the writer hadn’t noticed it)
Hastily-convened
Ignominious end
Tightly knit community
Rise of the 24-hour news cycle (it rose a long time ago)
Remains to be seen
Feeding frenzy/feeding the frenzy
Double down
Dons the mantle of
Hot-button issue
Face-saving compromise
The argument goes (or its cousin, “the thinking goes”)
Shutter (as a verb)
Paradigm shift (in journalism, all paradigms are shifting)
Unlikely revolutionary (in journalism, all revolutionaries are unlikely)
Unlikely reformer (in journalism, all reformers are unlikely)
Grizzled veteran (in journalism, all veterans are grizzled – unless they are “seasoned”)
Manicured lawns (in journalism, all nice lawns are manicured)
Rose from obscurity (in journalism, all rises are from obscurity)
Dizzying array (in journalism, all arrays make one dizzy)
Withering criticism (in journalism, all criticism is withering)
Predawn raid (in journalism, all raids are predawn)
Sparked debate (or “Raised questions”)
Ironic Capitalizations Implying Unimportance Of Things Others Consider Important
Provides fresh details
But reality/truth is more complicated (oversimplify, then criticize the oversimplification)
Scarred by war
Shines a spotlight on (unless there is a real spotlight that really shines)
TK is no panacea (nothing is)
No silver bullet
Shifting dynamics
Situation is fluid (code for “I have no idea what is going on”)
Partisans on both sides
Charm offensive
Pushback
Going forward
Stinging rebuke
Mr. TK goes to Washington (unless a reference to the actual movie)
The proverbial TK (“proverbial” doesn’t excuse the cliché, just admits you used it knowingly)
Fevered speculation
Oft-cited
Iconic
Growing body of evidence
Increasingly (unless we prove in the story that something is in fact increasing)
Tapped (as substitute for “selected” or “appointed)
Any “not-un” formulation (as in “not unsurprising”)
There, I said it (more self-important than “voicey”)
To be sure

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Revised Time Line for Research Paper


To: Students

From: M. Hall

Subject: Revised Time Line for Research Paper

Date: 2 March 2013 via Angry Verbs and Backboard, week of 4-8 March in class

 

Any variations are at the discretion of the instructor.  Remember that without a satisfactory research paper you cannot pass the class.  We will also work on other projects; the research paper is accomplished mostly out of class.

 

A.   14 January / 15 or 16 January.  Hand out and discuss research paper expectations. Repeat on Week of 25-29 March.

 

B.   25 / 26 or 27 March or 1 April / 2 - 4 April.  Topic and one-sentence thesis statement due. Turn this in on a full sheet of paper with a complete MLA heading for class sharing.  Zero grade if not turned in.

C.   Submit complete bibliography in MLA format with presentation of sources by Monday, 1 April, for English 1301, or Tuesday, 2 April or Thursday, 4 April for English 1302. Zero test grade if not turned in – and note that if there is a cluster of students who wait until the last day, the instructor will begin alphabetically and stop evaluating at the end of the period.  There can be no excuse for not accomplishing the bibliography in two months.

 

D.  8 April / 9 or 11 April.  COMPLETE rough draft, including revised bibliography, typed in MLA format, due for class sharing.  Zero grade if not turned in.

 

E.   If you turn in your paper NLT the beginning of class on 15 April (Monday class) / 16 or 18 April (Tuesday - Thursday class), you will receive 10 extra points.

 

If you turn in your paper NLT beginning of class, 22/23 or 24 April, no penalty

 

If you turn in your paper NLT the beginning of class on 29/ 29 or 30 April you will lose 10 points.  No papers will be accepted after roll call.  An absence on this day will not excuse you; the assignment was made in January.

English 1301 and 1302, Spring Projects


To: All English 1301 and 1302 Students

From: M. Hall

Subject: Spring Projects

Date: 2 March 2013

Via: Angry Verbs and BlackBoard

 

All Sections:  You may take your mid-term exam on Monday night, 5:30 P.M. – 8:40 P.M., 18 March, on Tuesday morning, 0900 – 11:05, and / or Thursday morning, 0900-11:05.  The exam will not be offered at any other time; three opportunities are generous in the extreme.

 

Your mid-term exam is 25% of your final grade. 

 

English 1301:

 

Please find and review the requirements for your persuasive research paper given to you on the first day of term in January.  You should make a list of possible topics (avoid the subjective and the emotional; this is research, not op-ed) and consider the accessibility of sources.

 

Please know that I will not accept any sources you don’t bring to me in printed form (I’ll give them back within the hour) to be approved by me in writing.  Books and scholarly journals may be difficult to find and check out, so know your topic and your sources.  If you are using a ‘net source, print the first page of the document, the last page of the document, and the specific content within the document to which you mean to refer, and bring it all to me for my approval (again, you’ll have it back within the hour).

 

The reason for this heavy lifting (which, depending on your sources, might not be a metaphor) is the reality that in our “infotainment” culture most people really do not understand the concept of accurate sources: such people will deny the advice of an attorney because of something a famous person said on a telescreened (allusion to Orwell’s 1984) talk show.  Such people will ignore a physician and employ treatments based on a ‘net search.  Popular culture, gossip, demagogues, entertainers, and opinions are useless; you need knowledge for various aspects of your live, and knowledge comes from authoritative sources.  A physician, nurse, or other health care professional is an authoritative source regarding diseases; the first babble-site that pops up from the glowing electric box that makes noises is not.  An experienced welder with multiple certifications is an authority on metallurgy; someone who in high school once spluttered a bunch of rods onto a cracked metal gate is not.  We’re going to have lots of talks about sources.  As a high school teacher asked me (in brilliant red ink) a long, long time ago, “How is it that Winston Churchill is one of your sources on the American Civil War?”

 

I will give you a timeline of specific tasks to be accomplished, and will sign off on them – if they are completed – each week.  The timeline I gave you in January is now off; I will rebuild it for you, but note the sequence. 

 

If you turn in your research paper NLT the beginning of class on 15 April, I will award you ten extra points. 

 

If you turn in your research paper NLT the beginning of class on 22 April, you neither gain nor lose points; this is the official due date.

 

If you turn in your research paper NLT the beginning of class on 29 April, you lose ten points – the paper was due the previous week.

 

If you run breathlessly into the room five minutes late on 29 April you have a zero.

 

We will use some class time for mutual aid, but most of research writing is outside of class. 

 

Your research paper is 25% of your final grade.  Without it, you cannot pass the class.

 

English 1302:

 

You will enjoy a cafeteria selection for your play: Jean Anouilh’s Becket, William Shakespeare’s Henry V, or Robert Bolt’s A Man for All Seasons.  I have work packets (with much writing, Hannah!) and DVDs for all of these, and after you have watched at least some of each, make a decision as to which one you want to work up from a packet of assignments for a series of grades. 

 

Henry V is in blank verse, which you have studied, and develops themes of statecraft, the Augustinian just war theory, the duties of man to the state and the state to men (the term is gender-inclusive), patriotism, and the “band of brothers” theme.  Lawrence Olivier’s 1944 Technicolor version was financed by the British government (is government funding bad?) as propaganda (emotional appeal – is that bad?) during World War II.  In this one read the French as Nazis.  The outdoor scenes were filmed in Ireland (and that Ireland chose to remain neutral does not speak well of that country) so that the large, colorful sets and hundreds of actors wouldn’t be attached by German warplanes.

 

The recent Kenneth Branagh version of Henry V is by a for-profit company (is that bad?), and is decidedly anti-war.  The famous “Non Nobis” scene after Agincourt is beautiful, ironic, and sad rather than triumphant. Thus we have two versions of one play, using the same words, but with two different viewpoints – and, yes, that’s all good.

 

Henry’s “We Band of Brothers” speech is now a regular feature of Remembrance Day / Veterans’ Day commemorations.  Set pieces from Henry V (“Brother John Bates, is that the sun…?”), Hamlet, and other Shakespearean plays frequently appear in Star Trek films.  This is because the themes transcend cultures and eras.

 

We also have two versions of A Man for All Seasons.   Robert Bolt, a professed agnostic, was fascinated with the idea of a man allowing himself to be executed rather than foreswear his faith, and wrote this play in the 1950s as a sort of exploration of ideas and courage.  The play and its dialogue follow William Roper’s biography; the presentation of More’s defense in court is said to be very accurate. 

 

The 1966 version, directed by Fred Zinneman, won six Academy Awards.  It is a big-budget production that differs from the original play mostly in losing the part of The Common Man, a sort of Greek chorus / narrator.  Be warned that around the middle of the film there is one (blank-blank-it) by More’s best friend, Thomas Howard.  I’m sorry it’s there; I think it’s unnecessary.  The lesser-known 1988 version, directed by and starring Charlton Heston, was also filmed on England but on a much smaller budget.  This is far closer to the play as written, with the restoration of the important role of The Common Man.  This made-for-television version is less-known, but Charlton Heston (World War II bomber-gunner, btw) loved this role and acted it on stage numerous times.  You know him best from The Ten Commandments (which Glenn Beck, for reasons best known to himself, mocked on the radio late in February of this year) and Planet of the Apes, but he made dozens of movies in all sorts of roles, including cowboy shoot-‘em-ups.  He loved Shakespeare, and his 1971 Antony and Cleopatra is a work of genius.

 

In the 1966 film, Anne Boleyn is played in a brief cameo by Vanessa Redgrave.  In the 1988 version she is super as Thomas More’s wife.  Redgrave is a Communist, an anti-Semite, and anti-American, but Heston felt sorry for her and gave her a job.  Sir John Gielgud is onstage all too briefly as the deliciously wicked Cardinal Wolsey.

 

Only one film version was made of Becket, in 1964, produced by Hal Wallis, who also made Casablanca and True Grit.  This play was written in the 1950s by Jean Anouilh, another agnostic, who was interested not only in the story of Thomas Becket but in issues of tension between church and state.  King Henry II is played by Peter O’Toole, and Becket by Richard Burton.  Sir John Gielgud has another cameo as the tricky, tricky King of France.  T.S. Eliot wrote the story of Thomas Becket about the same time as Jean Anouilh, in Murder in the Cathedral; to my knowledge this has never been filmed.  Eliot’s versification can be obscure, but his characterization of the four murderous knights as self-excusing government bureaucrats is excellent.

 

Thomas Becket…Thomas Becket…now how does he connect to The Canterbury Tales?

 

Research papers: some of you have not yet met your research paper requirement, so you will be somewhat busier than others.  Do not be shy about letting me know if you are sinking; I can modify the drama (meaning the plays, not the struggles of life) for you.  Your research paper is 25% of your final grade.