Saturday, September 29, 2012

Week 6, 1-5 October. Lessons.


English 1301

Monday P.M.

Tuesday and Thursday A.M.

Angryverbs.blogspot.com


Week of 1- 5 October 2012

 

Week 6 – Conclude PERSUASIVE WRITING, continue “The Seafarer” as a prelude to EXPOSITIVE WRITING, return DESCRIPTIVE ESSAYS

 

1.   Class begins when you enter the room; put away the plastic electrical toys that light up and make noises.  Open your journal and begin writing, work on your current assignment, update your notebook, or read the assigned pages in your textbook, but do not idle.

2.   Each class begins with journal writing.  Follow the prompt on the board.  Talk with each other.  Share knowledge.

3.   A typed, complete final draft of your two persuasive mini-essays in MLA format will be submitted as your name is called for roll on your first meeting of the week.  Two weeks are more than enough time for an effort requiring perhaps two hours; no late papers will be accepted.  An absence is no excuse; the assignment was posted on angryverbs.blogspot.com and on BlackBoard.  If you miss class, your essay is due at the next class with no penalty, but will not be accepted after that.

  1. This week we will continue reading “The Seafarer” in translation (it’s some 1,500 years old) as a prelude to an expository essay with internal citations and a short bibliography. Read Item 53, “MLA Documentation Style,” on pp. 517-519 in your Bedford,  8th edition.  Earlier editions may feature this on different pages.
  2. We are reading “Seafarer” not only as a source for practicing professional / academic writing but as a literary work in itself.  Some terms you will need to learn: four-beat line, rhythm, caesura, alliteration, elegy, exemplum, and kenning.  If you are not working at “Seafarer” and reading your long-term assignments outside of class, you’re not working.  Remember the college 3:1 rule.
  3. General debriefing of descriptive essays:

 

The combined scores of both classes:

 

90 – 99 – 14 students

80 - 89 -  15      

70 – 79 -    7      

0          -    9      

 

Roughly a third of all students earned an ‘A.’ These essays were a joy to read, and the writers should be proud of themselves for their hours and hours of meaningful effort.  Most of the other students wrote acceptable essays; if you didn’t, why not?

 

The zero papers are those which demonstrate a complete failure of the writer to read the instructions, listen to the teacher, read any of the handouts, read the material provided on angryverbs.blogspot.com or on BlackBoard, proofread, seek out the instructor for help, or seek out anyone else for a bit of advice.

 

When your papers are returned to you they are marked closely.  Read those marks and comments, and then work to understand – if you see “parallelism” next to a sequence, for instance, then look up “parallelism” in your text or other source to perceive the problem and then learn how to resolve it.  If you merely note your grade and do nothing to sort out the errors, you are not learning.  You will not pass this class through passivity.

 

Please read these general comments about the descriptive essays, and think:

 

Format – generally, the use of format was fair, but a number of you have not made the word-processing program of your choice obey you.  Do not turn in papers unless the formatting is perfect.

 

Tense change – most of you avoided this common error.

 

“I like to call…” – this pointless phrase was common.  Stop it.  Don’t write that you like to call your car Floyd; simply say that your car’s name is Floyd.

 

Memories / remember – you remember events in your life; you do not remember memories.

 

Beautiful / gorgeous / amazing sunrises – no.  There are no ugly sunrises, and very few amazing ones.  If you employ hyperbole and unnecessary adjectives in discussing ordinary occasions, what will you say when you really do encounter something beautiful / gorgeous / amazing? 

 

Monster – “monster” is applies only to a being that is capable of eating you. 

 

Topic sentence – avoid the annoying coyness of delaying the topic until the end of the first paragraph.  Respect your reader.

 

Noun-pronoun agreements – one person cannot be “they.” 

 

Hyperbole – understatement is always to be preferred. 

 

Exclamation marks - return the exclamation marks to junior high, where they belong, along with “extreme” and any not-cute variant spelling thereof, and the, like, totally rad “awesome.” 

 

Verb phrases – seldom employ verb phrases as subjects, i.e., “Being that my brother was a…”

 

Repetition – once you have written your essay, stop.  If your essay is too brief, you do not solve the problem by repeating what you have already written.

 

Overwriting / filler language / cliches’ / stilted language – “I walked along the gravel path” is good; “The amazing path along which the person known as me walked, skipped, jumped, and leaped happily to my special place along the path was layered in truckloads of rocks so that it wouldn’t wash away when the next hurricane came was a truly awesome and inspiring event that changed my life forever” isn’t.  Some of you compromised good ideas by writing as if you had cut up a thesaurus and dumped the words on the page.  Write short, plain, economical sentences that say what you want them to say; then add a very few adjectives and adverbs if they help.

 

Parallelism – items in sequence share a common grammatical structure and…oh, look it up.                                                                

 

Weak verbs – “have,” “has,” “is,” “go,” “went,” “gone,” “are,” and so on are sometimes exactly the right words to use, but not often.  I gave you a lesson on using strong verbs – were you texting under the table on the plastic electric box? 

 

Hallmark card language – Your family deserves better than sloppily sentimental language that would disgrace a greeting card – please, no more Ye Olde Good Ol’ Days When Life was Simple and Honest and Folks Never Met a Stranger and We Was Poor But We Didn’t Know it.  Please. 

 

K.I.S.S. – Keep It Short and Simple.  “Grandpa always wore those faded overalls that Grandma hated, and smelled like the hand-rolled cigarettes he smoked” says something.  “The wonderful, loving, marvelous gentle giant I liked to call my grandpa always clothed himself in old, faded, patched, grimy, blue overalls that Grandma hated, loathed, and despised, and was always and forever drenched in the smelly, stinky smell of the cigarettes that were rolled lovingly and skillfully by hand by him which I will remember forever and ever in my heart” is babbling.

 

Catalogues of adjectives – “I loved my rusty old Ford truck” is clear.  “I loved my cranky, squeaking, clanking, once-red, rusty, ancient, 1953 Ford truck” is babbling.

 

S.S. – sentence structure.  Write short, clear, simple sentences.  Make sure they say exactly what you want them to say.  Then stop.

 

Excessive detail – the reader doesn’t care that your desk has two drawers on the right-hand side, two drawers on the left-hand side, and a small drawer in the center.  That you have a desk is almost always enough information.

 

Queen-sized beds – this year’s flatscreen, I suppose.  “Queen-sized” is nothing more than advertising puffery, and says nothing.  That you have a bed is almost always enough information.

 

Paragraphing – generally very good.  Remember that a paragraph is predicated on one main idea. 

 

Just – whenever you employ the word “just,” you’re probably getting it wrong.  With “just” or with any other word, you must ask yourself why you are using this word in this place.

 

Would – as a helping verb: “We would go to town and then we would go for ice cream and then we would go home.”  Stop it.  Stop it now.  Use simple past tense.

 

Technical terms – every craft employs many specialized words for the sake of precise meaning for the cognoscenti, but which may not be clear to others.  “.270” means something to a hunter but nothing except evil mathematics to others.  Skillfully embed an explanation: “My sister enjoys hunting with her .270, which refers to her rifle and its calibre.”

 

Pronouns – “It.”  As with weak verbs, “it” is sometimes exactly the right word to use, but not often. 

 

Passive voice – the passive voice is to be avoided; you were told that by me.  Yes, there’s a bit of snarkiness (tho’ that’s a cliché’) in the preceding.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

C. S. Lewis to a Child on Writing Clearly



Source: http://www.lettersofnote.com/2012/04/c-s-lewis-on-writing.html

Note especially the listed items:

The Kilns
Headington Quarry
Oxford
26 June 1956

Dear Joan–

Thanks for your letter of the 3rd. You describe your Wonderful Night v. well. That is, you describe the place and the people and the night and the feeling of it all, very well — but not the thing itself — the setting but not the jewel. And no wonder! Wordsworth often does just the same. His Prelude (you're bound to read it about 10 years hence. Don't try it now, or you'll only spoil it for later reading) is full of moments in which everything except the thing itself is described. If you become a writer you'll be trying to describe the thing all your life: and lucky if, out of dozens of books, one or two sentences, just for a moment, come near to getting it across.

About amn't I, aren't I and am I not, of course there are no right or wrong answers about language in the sense in which there are right and wrong answers in Arithmetic. "Good English" is whatever educated people talk; so that what is good in one place or time would not be so in another. Amn't I was good 50 years ago in the North of Ireland where I was brought up, but bad in Southern England. Aren't I would have been hideously bad in Ireland but very good in England. And of course I just don't know which (if either) is good in modern Florida. Don't take any notice of teachers and textbooks in such matters. Nor of logic. It is good to say "more than one passenger was hurt," although more than one equals at least two and therefore logically the verb ought to be plural were not singular was!

What really matters is:–

1. Always try to use the language so as to make quite clear what you mean and make sure your sentence couldn't mean anything else.

2. Always prefer the plain direct word to the long, vague one. Don't implement promises, but keep them.

3. Never use abstract nouns when concrete ones will do. If you mean "More people died" don't say "Mortality rose."

4. In writing. Don't use adjectives which merely tell us how you want us to feel about the thing you are describing. I mean, instead of telling us a thing was "terrible," describe it so that we'll be terrified. Don't say it was "delightful"; make us say "delightful" when we've read the description. You see, all those words (horrifying, wonderful, hideous, exquisite) are only like saying to your readers, "Please will you do my job for me."

5. Don't use words too big for the subject. Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite.

Thanks for the photos. You and Aslan both look v. well. I hope you'll like your new home.

With love

yours
C.S. Lewis

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Lessons, 24-28 September 2012, Week 5


English 1301
Monday P.M.
Tuesday and Thursday A.M.
Angryverbs.blogspot.com
mhall46184@aol.com
Week of 24-28 September 2012


Week 5 – DESCRIPTIVE WRITING concluded,
PERSUASIVE WRITING continued

1.   Class begins when you enter the room; put away the plastic electrical toys that light up and make noises.  Open your journal and begin writing, work on your current assignment, update your notebook, or read the assigned pages in your textbook, but do not idle.

2.   Each class begins with journal writing.  Follow the prompt on the board.  Talk with each other.  Share knowledge.

3.   A typed, complete final draft of your descriptive essay in MLA format will be submitted as your name is called for roll on your first meeting of the week.  Two weeks are more than enough time for an effort requiring perhaps two hours; no late papers will be accepted.  An absence is no excuse; the assignment has been posted on angryverbs.blogspot.com and on BlackBoard for over three weeks.  If you miss class, your essay is due at the next class with no penalty, but will not be accepted after that.

  1. Your two persuasive mini-essays are due at the beginning of your first class next week.  There will be no rough-draft sessions, so if you want me to look over a rough draft, see me before or after class this week.  I command you to help each other.  When I don’t want you to work together I’ll let you know.
  2. This week we will begin reading “The Seafarer” in translation (it’s some 1,500 years old) as a prelude to an expository essay with internal citations and a short bibliography. Read Item 53, “MLA Documentation Style,” on pp. 517-519 in your Bedford 8th edition.  Earlier editions may feature this on different pages.
  3. I will make photocopies of “The Seafarer” (the title is in quotation marks / inverted commas because this is a short poem) for you; you can also find various modern translations on the ‘net.  We will read “Seafarer” not only as a gobbet for professional / career writing but as a literary work in itself.  Some terms you will need to learn: four-beat line rhythm, caesura, alliteration, elegy, exemplum, and kenning. 
  4. A solar week of seven 24-hour days gives you a total of 168 hours.  You have chosen to take approximately 2 ½ of those 168 hours for formal class time in English 1301.  Thus, you have 165 ½ remaining hours each week in which you may put your head down and rest.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Persuasive Writing Techniques


English 1301
Angelina College
M. Hall 

Persuasive Writing Techniques

Each of the Real Clear windows provides (“each” is the simple subject; “provides” is the predicate) numerous essays from various points of view in several different areas:  politics, history, world news, religion, books, and others.  Many of these essays are persuasive, and you may wish to read them as examples of how to develop arguments, both logically and emotionally.

In addition to reading essays with which you agree, burrow (metaphorically) through those with which you don’t agree to see how the writer has developed his (the pronoun “his” is in context gender-neutral) arguments.  This will help you understand how other folks think and will help you clarify and defend your own ideas.

This is an adult site, not “adult” in the euphemistic sense of immorality but adult in the proper sense of addressing an audience of mature, reasonably well-read citizens of this republic.

 




Saturday, September 15, 2012

Week 4 - Descriptive Writing, Persuasive Writing



English 1301
Monday P.M.
Tuesday and Thursday A.M.
Angryverbs.blogspot.com
mhall46184@aol.com

Week 4 – DESCRIPTIVE WRITING continued,
introduction to PERSUASIVE WRITING

1.   Class begins when you enter the room; put away the plastic electrical toys that light up and make noises.  Open your journal and begin writing, work on your current assignment, update your notebook, or read the assigned pages in your textbook, but do not idle.
2.   Each class begins with journal writing.  Follow the prompt on the board.  Talk with each other.  Share knowledge.
3.   A typed, complete rough draft of your descriptive essay in MLA format will be submitted as your name is call for roll on your first meeting of the week, and will then be returned to you for in-class re-working.  A week is more than enough time for an effort requiring perhaps two hours; no late papers will be accepted.  An absence is no excuse; the assignment has been posted on angryverbs.blogspot.com and on BlackBoard for over two weeks
4.   Your rough draft will be given a grade mostly on its mere existence, probably a 100 – and how easy can this be?  If your paper is not typed, not in MLA format, or not complete, or if it is inadequate in any way, expect a well-earned zero.
5.   Re-work the rough draft of your descriptive essay.  I will give you as much one-on-one assistance in class as I can, but there is little time.  I am also available before and after class.  I am not going to proof-read your paper, nor are any comments contractural – I will point out some problems and make suggestions only; you must build your final draft.
6.   The final draft of your descriptive essay is due at the beginning of your first class of next week.  No late papers will be accepted.
7.   After work on your rough drafts we will begin our study of persuasive writing.  There is a lengthy handout which will not be posted on line, so take care of it.  The instructor will talk a great deal, but you must also spend some serious study time outside of class.  Anticipate an essay to follow, but for now focus on your descriptive essay.
8.   If you write me (“email” is not a verb), remember to follow the business letter format I gave you.  This is a writing class, after all, and you are building your professional skills.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

No Late Papers

Please remember that you have, as previously assigned, a typed, double-spaced, complete rough draft of your descriptive essay due at roll call on Monday evening for the night class or on Tuesday morning for the morning class.

I do not accept late papers; a week is more than enough time for an assignment requiring perhaps two hours.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

From Paul Gil, About.com, a useful article re online research


How Proper Online Research Works

Legitimate methods, suggested techniques, good sense, and plenty of patience

By Paul Gil, About.com Guide

See More About:


September, 2012

Legitimate online research involves much more than 10 seconds with Google and copy-pasting the Wikipedia links. Legitimate research is called re-search for a reason: patient repetition, careful filtering, and diligent citing of articles, all with a critical and skeptical mindset that separates drivel from useful content. There are over 80 billion web pages published, and most of those pages are not worth quoting. To successfully sift it all, you must use consistent and reliable filtering methods. You will need patience to see the full breadth of writing on any single topic. And you will need your critical thinking skills to disbelieve anything until it is intelligently validated.

If you are a student, or if you are seeking serious medical, professional, or historical information, definitely heed these 8 suggested steps to researching online:

1. Decide if the Topic Is 'Hard Research', 'Soft Research', or Both.

'Hard' and 'soft' research have different expectations of data and proof. You should know the hard or soft nature of your topic to point your search strategy where it will yield the most compelling research results.

A) 'Hard research' describes scientific and objective research, where proven facts, figures, statistics, and measurable evidence are absolutely critical. In hard research, the credibility of every resource must be able to withstand intense scrutiny.

B) 'Soft research' describes topics that are more subjective, cultural, and opinion-based. Soft research sources will be less scrutinized by the readers.

C) Combined soft and hard research requires the most work, because this hybrid topic broadens your search requirements. Not only do you need to find hard facts and figures, but you will need to debate against very strong opinions to make your case. Politics and international economy topics are the biggest examples of hybrid research.


Cancer Treatment CentersDiscover Integrated Cancer Care at Cancer Treatment Centers of Americacancercenter.com

Learn Research MethodsUIC Online Certificate|Educational Research Methodology-Apply today!www.go.uic.edu/onlinemesa

Marketing Strategies14 Ideas for Promoting Your Small Business - Download Our Guide Now!PRWeb.com

2. Choose Which Online Authorities Are Suitable for Your Research Topic.

A) Soft research topics are often about collating the opinions of respected online writers. Many soft research authorities are not academics, but rather writers who have practical experience in their field. Soft research usually means the following sources:

1.   Blogs, including personal opinion blogs and amateur writer blogs (e.g. ConsumerReports, UK politics).

2.   Forums and discussion sites (e.g. Police discussion forum)

3.   Consumer product review sites (e.g. ZDnet, Epinions).

4.   Commercial sites that are advertising-driven (e.g. About.com)

5.   Tech and computer sites (e.g.Overclock.net).

B) Hard research topics require hard facts and academically-respected evidence. An opinion blog will not cut it; you will need to find publications by scholars, experts, and professionals with credentials. The Invisible Web will often be important for hard research. Accordingly, here are possible content areas for your hard research topic:

1.   Academic journals (e.g. a list of academic search engines here).

2.   Government publications (e.g. Google's 'Uncle Sam' search).

3.   Government authorities (e.g. the NHTSA)

4.   Scientific and medical content, sanctioned by known authorites (e.g. Scirus.com).

5.   Non-government websites that are NOT influenced by advertising and obvious sponsorship e.g. Consumer Watch)

6.   Archived news (e.g. Internet Archive)

3. Use Different Search Engines and Keywords

Now comes the primary legwork: using different search engines and using 3-5 keyword combinations. Patient and constant adjusting of your keywords are key here.

1.   Firstly, start with broad initial researching at Internet Public Library, DuckDuckGo, Clusty/Yippy, Wikipedia, and Mahalo. This will give you a broad sense of what categories and related topics are out there, and give you possible directions to aim your research.

2.   Secondly, narrow and deepen your Visible Web searching with Google and Ask.com. Once you have experimented with combinations of 3 to 5 different keywords, these 3 search engines will deepen the results pools for your keywords.

3.   Thirdly, go beyond Google, for Invisble Web (Deep Web) searching. Because Invisible Web pages are not spidered by Google, you'll need to be patient and use slower and more specific search engines like:

·        Scirus (for scientific searching)

·        Internet Archive (to backwards-search past current events)

·        Advanced Clusty Searching (meta searching specific parts of the Internet)

·        Surfwax (much more knowledge-focused and much less commerce-driven than Google)


4. Bookmark and Stockpile Possible Good Content.

While this step is simple, this is the second-slowest part of the whole process: this is where we gather all the possible ingredients into organized piles, which we sift through later. Here is the suggested routine for bookmarking pages:

1.   CTRL-Click the interesting search engine result links. This will spawn a new tab page each time you CTRL-Click.

2.   When you have 3 or 4 new tabs, quickly browse them and do an initial assessment on their credibility.

3.   Bookmark any tabs you consider credible on first glance.

4.   Close the tabs.

5.   Repeat with the next batch of links.

This method, after about 45 minutes, will have yielded you dozens of bookmarks to sift through.

5. Filter and Validate the Content.

This is the slowest step of all: vetting and filtering which content is legitimate, and which is drivelous trash. If you are doing hard research, this is also the most important step of all, because your resources MUST withstand close examination later.

1.   Carefully consider the author/source, and the date of publication. Is the author an authority with professional credentials, or someone who is peddling their wares and trying to sell you a book? Is the page undated, or unusually old? Does the page have its own domain name (e.g. honda.com, e.g. gov.co.uk), or is it some deep and obscure page buried at MySpace?

2.   Be suspicious of personal web pages, and any commercial pages that have a shoddy, amateurish presentation. Spelling errors, grammar errors, poor formatting, cheesy advertising on the side, absurd fonts, too many blinking emoticons... these are all red flags that the author is not a serious resource, and does not care about the quality of their publishing.

3.   Be suspicious of scientific or medical pages that display scientific or medical advertising. For example: if you are researching veterinarian advice, be wary if the veterinarian web page displays blatant advertising for dog medicine or pet food. Advertising can possibly indicate a conflict of interest or hidden agenda behind the writer's content.

4.   Be suspicious of any ranting, overstating, overly-positive, or overly-negative commentary. If the author insists on ranting and crying foul, or conversely seems to shower excessive praise, that could be a red flag that there is dishonesty and fraudulent motivations behind the writing.

5.   Commercial consumer websites can be good resources, but be skeptical of every comment you read. Just because 7 people rave that Pet Food X is good for their dogs does not necessarily mean it is good for you. Similarly, if 5 people out of 600 complain about a particular vendor, that doesn't mean the vendor is necessarily bad. Be patient, be skeptical, and be slow to form an opinion.

6.   Use your intuition if something seems amiss with the web page. Perhaps the author is just a little too positive, or seems a little too closed to other opinions. Maybe the author uses profanity, name-calling, or insults to try to make his point. The formatting of the page might seem childlike and haphazard. Or you get the sense that the author is trying to sell you something. If you get any subconscious sense that there is something not quite right about the web page, then trust your intuition.

7.   Use Google 'link:' feature to see the 'backlinks' for a page. This technique will list incoming hyperlinks from the major websites that recommend the web page of interest. These backlinks will give you an indicator how much respect the author has earned around the Internet. Simply go to google and enter 'link:www.(the web page's address)' to see the backlinks listed.

6. Make a Final Decision on Which Argument You Now Support.

After spending a few hours researching, your initial opinion may have changed. Maybe you are relieved, maybe you are more afraid, maybe you've just learned something and opened your mind that much more. Whichever it is, you will need to have an informed opinion if you are about to publish a report or thesis for your professor.

If you have a new opinion, you might have to redo your research (or re-sift your existing research bookmarks) in order to collate facts that support your new opinion and thesis statement.

7. Quote and Cite the Content.

While there is not a single universal standard for citing (acknowledging) quotes from the Internet, the Modern Language Association and American Psychological Association are two very respected citing methods:

Here is an example MLA citation:

Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. The Internet Classics Archive.
Web Atomic and Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
13 Sept. 2007. Web. 4 Nov. 2008. ‹http://classics.mit.edu/›.

Here is a sample APA citation:

Bernstein, M. (2002). 10 tips on writing the living Web. A
List Apart: For People Who Make Websites, 149.
Retrieved from http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writeliving


More details: The Purdue University Owl Guide explains both of these citing methods in detail:



Remember: DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. You must either directly quote the author, or rewrite and summarize the content (along with appropriate citing). But to restate the author's words as your own is illegal, and will get you a failing mark on your thesis or paper.

8. Choose a Research-Friendly Web Browser

Researching is repetitive and slow. You will want a tool that supports many open pages, and easily backtracks through previous pages. A good research-friendly Web browser offers:

1.   Multiple tab pages open simultaneously.

2.   Bookmarks/favorites that are fast and easy to manage.

3.   Page history that is easy to recall.

4.   Loads pages quickly for your computer's memory size.

Of the many choices in 2011, the best research browsers are Chrome and Firefox, followed by Opera. IE9 is also a competent browser, but try the previous 3 choices for their speed and memory economy.